Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seed of Andromeda

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 19:39, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Seed of Andromeda

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I declined a speedy delete for this article because non-web-based games are not eligible for A7, and I believe this not a web-based game. That said, the game is probably insufficiently notable to meet our guidelines, so I'm nominating it. Full disclosure: I have not done much WP:BEFORE and I'm fairly unfamiliar with computer video games. I'll leave it to a hopefully more enlightened community to decide. Bbb23 (talk) 16:01, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 16:19, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:59, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Can't find anything reliable about it. It appears to be another Minecraft ripoff of no notability. JT_dale^Talk~ 19:37, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Article topic lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. (?) No hits in a video game reliable sources search. There are no worthwhile redirect targets. Please ping me if more (non-English and offline) sources show in the future. czar ⨹ 17:42, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.