Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/See you next Tuesday
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was transwiki and delete. I think the disambig page is a good idea and will be glad to implement it once the transwiki is done. --jonny-mt 05:49, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- See you next Tuesday (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
per WP:Wikipedia_is_not_a_dictionary this is always going to be a stub so its encyclopedic possibilities are limited. Belongs in Wiktionary, where the phrase already has an entry. Rodhullandemu (Talk) 18:59, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Transwiki to Wiktionary - Dicionary definitions do not belong here. Soxred93 (u t) 19:21, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, per nominator. I can't see what encyclopedic information can be described here, although it might make a valid disambiguation page. Marasmusine (talk) 22:51, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- DAB would also be an option, since the article contains two references; I'll leave that to whomever closes this. --Rodhullandemu (Talk) 23:03, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Traswiki Wikitionary, probably put difinition link on See You Next Tuesday, which is not the same. PwnerELITE (talk) 03:00, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Transwiki to Wiktionary per WP:WINAD. Stifle (talk) 20:14, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.