Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/See You Dancin' (2nd nomination)
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Wizardman 23:43, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
See You Dancin'[edit]
AfDs for this article:
- See You Dancin' (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
one sentance does not an article make. not notable at all. Alan - talk 21:56, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. The article is a stub. See Wikipedia:Stub for an explanation of why stubs are useful. If this article is too short, it should be expanded rather than deleted. - Eastmain (talk) 22:05, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. —J04n(talk page) 22:28, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- from WP:STUB - "Note that if a small article has little properly sourced information, or if its subject has no inherent notability, it may be deleted or be merged into another relevant article." Alan - talk 22:48, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment- Article Meets one of the criteria you listed for deleting. "or if its subject has no inherent notability". This article shows inherent notability as it is a song done by a notable artist. Needs expansion but once again, not necessarily deletion worth.--Fbifriday (talk) 23:40, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- from WP:STUB - "Note that if a small article has little properly sourced information, or if its subject has no inherent notability, it may be deleted or be merged into another relevant article." Alan - talk 22:48, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - no claim of notability. —D. Monack talk 08:08, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. I'm not finding any "in-depth" coverage for this song, but it has charted in at least a couple countries, Belgium and Finland. Gongshow Talk 19:02, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 23:28, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete or Incubate, as per WP:NSONGS: Most songs do not rise to notability for an independent article and should redirect to another relevant article, such as for the songwriter, a prominent album or for the artist who prominently performed the song. Doubt that it meets notability. Cocytus [»talk«] 21:39, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Per WP:NSONGS as the song has not been covered or won awards. There have been a few comments here that the song has charted in some countries, but sources have not been provided. I spent some time looking for a single source that shows the song charted someplace, but was unable. I will gladly strike this comment if a source could be found, but what I was seeing in my search were clouded results - the artist did release this as a single, and other songs charted, so they seemed to be lumped together in the search results. The artist's article does not indicate that the song charted either. Vulture19 (talk) 20:32, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.