Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Security Practices and Research Student Association

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 01:08, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Security Practices and Research Student Association[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This doesn't look like it meets WP:ORG to me. I'm seeing minimal coverage from sources not affiliated with RIT. Most student organizations aren't independently notable, and that certainly seems to be the case here too. BDD (talk) 20:04, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. BDD (talk) 20:04, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. BDD (talk) 20:05, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. BDD (talk) 20:07, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I could not find anything substantial for this to establish notability. Ceosad (talk) 23:46, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as I also found nothing to suggest obvious better improvement. SwisterTwister talk 07:11, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Nominate to delete because there is simply no third-party sources to justify this page. To keep it, the page needs heavy documentation from third-party sources. As it stands now, I recommend this page for deletion. WikiWatcher987 (talk) 05:26, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.