Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Secret Fantasies

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 06:02, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Secret Fantasies[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. No reliable sources provided or found. In a chain of vanity articles for the production company and the producer. Bleakcomb (talk) 10:44, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:37, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:37, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ♔ 05:50, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Just not finding sources to establish notability (per WP:GNG or WP:NFILM). Several claims indicate significance but again, not finding anything to back it up. Combining "secret fantasies" with the various publications it refers to returns nothing. --— Rhododendrites ^talk | 22:53, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I am also unable to find coverage to show that this film meets WP:GNG or WP:NF. Gongshow talk 00:59, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.