Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Second child of the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge (disambiguation)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 10:09, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Second child of the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge (disambiguation)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This isn't a reasonable disambiguation page. I see no particular reason why we should list all the second children of Dukes of Cambridge. I find it hard to believe that anybody is searching for any of the others. In any case, as far as I can tell, we have no comparable disambiguation pages - Fifth child of the King of France, Fourth child of the Earl of Essex, Seventh child of the Tsar of Russia, etc. St Anselm (talk) 10:02, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: The page won't be that for long, and the main will be redirected to the baby's first name anyway so may as well delete as it will be redundant. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 10:18, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Stunningly ridiculous. Clarityfiend (talk) 12:04, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguation-related deletion discussions. Esquivalience ^t 13:54, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Esquivalience ^t 13:55, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Esquivalience ^t 13:55, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Per Talk:Second child of the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge (disambiguation), this page should be moved (with a redirect) to Second child of the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge.
- We cannot delete Second child of the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge because it is widely linked to from outside Wikipedia.
- Given that Second child of the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge exists and is a disambiguation page it is standard procedure that a redirect exists from Talk:Second child of the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge (disambiguation).
- Note this is the procedure was followed in the case of the widely linked to (and widely referred to) First child of the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge

All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 13:57, 2 May 2015 (UTC).

Either Delete, or Redirect to whatever the child's article name turns out to be. Still a ridiculous page name. Please can we stop making these? -- The Anome (talk) 14:06, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as absolutely pointless!. –Davey2010^Talk 15:39, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Nobody in their right mind would search any article in such a way '''tAD''' (talk) 22:07, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I'm puzzled this was created in the first place. —Мандичка^YO 😜 15:25, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.