Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seckford Trust
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Sr13 (T|C) 09:32, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Seckford Trust (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Does not appear to meet notability criteria FisherQueen (Talk) 19:42, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge into Woodbridge School. --Wafulz 20:36, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. It's been (or at any rate claims to have been) in continuous existence since the reign of Elizabeth I. It is surely one of the .n% of oldest among extant organizations, where n is some ridiculously small number. Does that confer notability? I don't know, I'm just pointing it out. But it must have enough history to make a decent article, you'd think. Herostratus 21:20, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I've added references. It's never going to be a featured article, but I think it can stand on its own.Chris Croy 21:51, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Oh yeah. Notability. Um, it's been name-dropped by The Guardian and The Daily Standard, as my references would tell you. Neither referenced article focuses exclusively on it, but I think that's pretty good for a charity that only operates in a 65 mile radius of some English town. I can cough up some references to royalty dropping by their supported organizations if anyone thinks it'd help.Chris Croy 21:53, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mailer Diablo 10:40, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- keep I added another ref to the notable founder. DGG 22:15, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Article is now more than adequately sourced. Seed 2.0 23:30, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.