Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seattle Bible College

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result wasno consensus. JYolkowski // talk 17:05, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Seattle Bible College[edit]

Vanispamcruftisement. Up until a couple of days ago, the page looked like this, which should clear up any doubts that the article is a platform for self-promotion. Despite all the self-glorification etc., no claims to notability... The Crying Orc 08:39, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: the revised article looks acceptable; content similar to other articles at List of bible colleges. -- MightyWarrior 11:19, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, was ad, now is non-notable. Only school's own website cited. Don't see how this one would (even come close) to passing WP:CORP. Seraphimblade 12:01, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete, CSD A7. Simões (^talk/_contribs) 18:13, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per MightyWarrior. Agent 86 19:19, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Seraphimblade, no signs of notability whatsoever. Mightwarrior's argument fails WP:INN. Xtifr _tälk 03:07, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

But note that WP:INN is not a guideline or policy - see Inclusionism for the opposite pov. -- MightyWarrior 12:03, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

- Comment. WP:INN is a logical extension of every guideline and policy. "Someone else got away with reverting 4 times once" will not keep you from getting blocked on 3RR. "Someone else made a personal attack once and didn't get in trouble" doesn't mean you won't. "An ad article once didn't get deleted for a full 3 months" doesn't mean we must keep all ad articles for a minimum 3-month period. So what would make this one different, to where "Someone else got away with it" applies? Seraphimblade 04:12, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.