Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Search for a Supermodel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Courcelles (talk) 00:21, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Search for a Supermodel[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm not sure if this can be improved or is notable as my searches found nothing with the best being the IMDb link at Italian Wiki and I'm not seeing a good move target. This has hardly changed much less improved since September 2006 so the time is now for attention. SwisterTwister talk 21:45, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 21:46, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 21:46, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 21:46, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Notable show on national network; hasn't really changed in nine years because the show was canceled twelve years ago (and pretty much had all its wind sucked up by Australia's Next Top Model), but notability doesn't expire. Nate • (chatter) 03:17, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mrschimpf Can this be improved is the question though. SwisterTwister talk 04:23, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - I'd imagine there's not many sources considering A) It didn't last very long, and B) No one barely ever used the internet in those days so I'd imagine books and newspapers are the only sources out there on this, personally I think it should be kept and improved . –Davey2010^Talk 23:40, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Per Davey2010, article is most likely notable and can be improved. MrWooHoo (talk) 00:00, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.