Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seanna Leath

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 10:23, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Seanna Leath[edit]

Seanna Leath (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO, no significant coverage at media and minor academic achievements. Bbarmadillo (talk) 09:47, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arkansas-related deletion discussions. CptViraj (📧) 09:56, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 11:55, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 11:55, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete 2019 PhD + assistant professor makes WP:NPROF unlikely. Citations etc aren't there, and there's no evidence for any other notability provided. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 12:16, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per WP:TOOSOON. New assistant professors almost always have not had enough time for their publications to achieve the impact needed for WP:PROF notability, this article provides no evidence of being an exception, and with low citations on Google Scholar and no published books the two most-likely pathways for academics to become notable are both not yet open. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:49, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete No more discussion needed. scope_creepTalk 12:34, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - I'd like to hear from more voices before !voting on, or closing, this discussion. Too early closing may be controversial. I've alerted some Wiki projects to join the discussion (not canvassing). Bearian (talk) 16:19, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, still is an ordinary academic among the hundreds of thousands out there. Geschichte (talk) 19:58, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Far WP:Too soon. Xxanthippe (talk) 23:57, 10 December 2019 (UTC).[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.