Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sean Michael Thomas

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. L Faraone 05:14, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sean Michael Thomas

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject does not seem notable, the sources are all primary, and the article's early history is dominated by promotional-seeming SPA's. הסרפד (call me Hasirpad) (formerly R——bo) 00:58, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. czar · · 01:02, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. czar · · 01:02, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. czar · · 01:02, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News-related deletion discussions. czar · · 01:02, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I don't remember how I arrived at this article originally but I do remember thinking that his notability was questionable and I also suspected that this might be an article by Sean Michael Thomas himself which is contrary to Wikipedia policy. Mike Hayes (talk) 03:40, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

So are you voting Delete or just commenting? Thanks! Qworty (talk) 11:43, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Non-notable journeyman journalist who fails WP:AUTHOR and WP:BK and who apparently wrote his own article in violation of WP:AUTO. Let's get rid of this one. Qworty (talk) 11:45, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J04n(talk page) 02:43, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.