Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sean Kerr

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 20:46, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sean Kerr[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

He just about meets WP:NFOOTBALL because of 16 mins of professional football over two matches about 14 years ago. He then played 5 games in the fourth tier of Scotland then seemingly disappeared. I can find nothing to suggest a passing of WP:GNG. Growing consensus now that players that barely pass NFOOTBALL need to meet GNG. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 23:16, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 23:16, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 23:16, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 23:16, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 23:18, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - there is longstanding consensus that scraping by on NFOOTBALL with one (or two) appearances is insufficient when GNG was failed comprehensively, as is the case here. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 12:48, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails in passing WP:BASIC. Hulatam (talk) 13:40, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I agree with arguments above. Clearly does not have the level of notability that would merit an article. Dunarc (talk) 23:51, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Failing wp:before search. ~ Ase1este_{charge-parity}^time 13:33, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails WP:GNG here despite only scrapping past WP:NFOOTY. HawkAussie (talk) 23:24, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.