Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sean James Cameron

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 07:04, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sean James Cameron

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

British gardening journalist who wrote a couple of local history books a decade ago. No suggestion that he meets WP:JOURNALIST or WP:BASIC, no secondary sources, and I can't find any myself that aren't trivial "John Smith at Big Company said..." mentions. Article was prodded, and immediately unprodded by an IP. McGeddon (talk) 09:18, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Lacking any non-trivial RS coverage for WP:BIO. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 14:34, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as not yet solidly notable. SwisterTwister talk 20:08, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 20:09, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 20:09, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wales-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 20:09, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, have only been able to find this Daily Telegraph article[1] - YouTube gardeners: dishing the dirt online which reports on Cameron amongst other youtube gardeners, but not enough for WP:ANYBIO, article references are not useable for notability (even his My Mail Garden blog that has pictures of a cute squirrel and a cool cat:}) Coolabahapple (talk) 14:45, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.