Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seafight

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 20:50, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Seafight[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unnotable game GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 18:34, 10 June 2021 (UTC) An online game which I don't see the notability of. Tagged for primary sources since 2010. Even though there are multiple interwiki links, the sourcing isn't better on any of those or in some, there are no sources whatsoever. I have found two sources that are somewhat acceptable, though I have doubts of their reliability. I know that IGN is a reliable source, but that article reads more like a press release. The first review is okay, though I don't know whether "mmobomb.com" is reliable or not. Other than these I only found links where you can play the game and trivial mentions. So I don't think this is a notable game. COI might also apply, as the article creator only edited articles about games made by Bigpoint, which also made this game (and "Radon Labs" is a subsidiary of Bigpoint).GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 18:30, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 18:36, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. There is a review here but it's the only one I could find. The IGN source above is a press relase and MMOBomb is not reliable. Thus, the game does not pass WP:GNG or WP:NVG. IceWelder [✉] 19:04, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for clarifying that MMOBomb is not reliable. Then we have only one good source (the Gamestar one) and one good source is not enough. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 18:39, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unless better sources are found, right now it fails GNG. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:39, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Not enough coverage to pass general notability guidelines. Fails GNG. TheDreamBoat (talk) 15:08, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.