Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sea water gel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 03:39, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sea water gel

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Happened across this today. The only references given in the article were an advertisement in a northern European language (Norwegian, perhaps?), two other Wikipedia articles with marginal relevance, and something about Milk of Magnesia being a cure for oily skin. I could find nothing relevant on a Google search for this. All in all, I don't think this meets the general notability guidelines. -- Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 00:14, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:19, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:19, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Just sales promo by a beauty blogger. Xxanthippe (talk) 00:29, 28 June 2017 (UTC).[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:23, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - nowhere near notable. There are sufficient existing articles on gel and related topics. Chiswick Chap (talk) 10:38, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Non-notable. DaveApter (talk) 15:56, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.