Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sea protest
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Mkdwtalk 05:11, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Sea protest (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article does not provide any sources, and I cannot find any sources that would provide more that a basic dictionary-like definition. Jc3s5h (talk) 20:15, 29 May 2013 (UTC) Fixing page creation and listing Dricherby (talk) 20:42, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:49, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:49, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, literally thousands of results in books. — Cirt (talk) 03:08, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Added a couple of references, but cannot find any news sources. It seems notable enough for an article.Martin451 (talk) 21:55, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, now adequately referenced and when you find one of these you need to know why the master is complaining to a solicitor about the weather - useful. Not sure about the title though, would "Protest (marine)" be better Peterrivington (talk) 19:50, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- All the sources call it a "sea protest" so the current title seems correct. Dricherby (talk) 07:14, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Has sources and the article's second paragraph goes beyond dicdef. Dricherby (talk) 07:14, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.