Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sea Urchin Editions

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tawker (talk) 06:48, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sea Urchin Editions[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable organization. Possible vanity page; created by a possible single-purpose account. Nothing of interest on Google News or Google Books. No article in the Dutch Wikipedia. Vectro (talk) 16:21, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. Vectro (talk) 16:21, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Vectro (talk) 16:21, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I have also nominated Cold Turkey Press for speedy deletion, and Ben Schot for AfD. These pages are related and have the same author. Vectro (talk) 16:21, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:28, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Failed to pass WP:GNG and WP:ORG for me. SarahStierch (talk) 16:48, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.