Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SeaPeeKay

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 19:05, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

SeaPeeKay[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I did a quick google search and see the platforms he takes part in, but I don't see the in-depth coverage to pass WP:GNG in my opinion. Govvy (talk) 16:17, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. CommanderWaterford (talk) 16:48, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. CommanderWaterford (talk) 16:48, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:22, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails WP:GNG. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 17:43, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Yet another non-notable Minecraft streamer. Poydoo can talk and edit 22:23, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - For what it's worth, he had a couple of mentions ([1][2]) in the Guinness Book blog. Apparently for inventing new ways to play Minecraft competitively. As far as I can tell that fizzled, though. ApLundell (talk) 23:16, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO. IceWelder [✉] 09:10, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - The article fails WP:GNG as there aren’t much articles made about this person. The only notable articles that I found were two articles from the Guinness World Records. (Jullian Neon) 20:51, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per lack of WP:RS, and also WP:OUTCOMES. Only has poor sources. We have deleted dozens of pages about YouTubers, even those with millions of followers, if they can't be sourced properly. Bearian (talk) 16:06, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.