Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scotty Coyote

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 16:18, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Scotty Coyote

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO and WP:NACTOR. Only a very, very, very few stuntpeople get noticed. Clarityfiend (talk) 23:38, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:43, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:43, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:43, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete 11 credits across 11 years is mere peanuts for a stuntman. Doesn't appear to have had a noted career either. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 22:56, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KTC (talk) 00:26, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As nominator said, very few stunt men become notable. That's the nature of the profession; it is their job to be invisible, to let the stars they double for take the limelight. I guess he did that job well, because he does not appear to have gotten significant coverage from anybody. --MelanieN (talk) 02:11, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - as MelanieN quite rightly points out, the unfortunate part about being a stunt-person is that if you do your job well, you won't receive significant coverage in multiple reliable sources. Such is the case here. St★lwart¹¹¹ 04:15, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.