Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott Stajcer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The consensus is that the subject does not satisfy either the notability guidelines for hockey players or the general notability guideline. Mz7 (talk) 22:12, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Scott Stajcer[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG Triggerbit (talk) 20:51, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 22:33, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 22:33, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 22:33, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 22:33, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Spent 2 regular season games on an NHL roster, even though he did not play, and I was able to find a number of articles about him, for example here, here and here, not counting coverage of his fight with Malcolm Subban which would not count towards GNG. Rlendog (talk) 16:42, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

They have to actually play to meet NHOCKEY. (Not a comment on if they meet GNG or not) -DJSasso (talk) 12:32, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. He does not meet NHOCKEY. I mentioned his time in the NHL because that is still a notch more than most players who never played an NHL game have, which I view as a relevant consideration in a close case. Rlendog (talk) 19:26, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - After reviewing WP:NHOCKEY and the comments below, I have been swayed to move this to delete as it does seem to be typical local mentions. -- Dane ^talk 20:59, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Passes WP:GNG. -- Dane ^talk 18:46, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz ^Humbug! 06:17, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, does not meet WP:NHOCKEY, and I don't see how or where he might meet WP:GNG either. PK T(alk) 18:51, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete being on a roster does not give notability, the person has to have playing time.John Pack Lambert (talk) 06:03, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails to meet WP:NHOCKEY and coverage is local and/or typical of any minor league athlete. I don't see that WP:GNG is met. Papaursa (talk) 18:39, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't see how the coverage is "typical of any minor league athlete." We go through many AfDs for minor league hockey players and most do not have this kind of coverage. Rlendog (talk) 15:55, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 16:27, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Does not seem to meet the NHOCKEY criteria. Lots of brief mentions but I do not think the coverage of the subject qualifies as SIGCOV. Hrodvarsson (talk) 23:25, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- The articles I linked to all are full articles specifically about Stajcer. That is not just a "brief mention." Rlendog (talk) 15:57, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG. Flibirigit (talk) 14:22, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.