Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott Parker (Theater Designer & Professor)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was userfy and delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:23, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Scott Parker (Theater Designer & Professor)

Vanity page. cholmes75 (chit chat) 02:23, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep only if he can explain in what capacity he was credited for some of the cited programmes. If only as cameraman, and with no more explanation of notability or reference citations, delete. --Daniel C. Boyer 17:15, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and Expand and Verify Notability Based on the information so far, there can be some notability here. However, the notability needs to be made clearer and expanded. joturner 02:33, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Even if it is all verified, I still don't see anything that meets the WP:BIO criteria.--Isotope23 16:04, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - vanity page apparently created scott himself. No significant notability that can easily be seen. Fails WP:BIO at the moment and based on [google] probably for the immediate future - Peripitus (Talk) 02:47, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no notability at all evident from article or from from website. vanity page Bwithh 02:57, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Bwithh (again!). --Andeh 03:02, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and Expand and Verify Notability. Per joturner. — WCityMike ^(T | C) ⇓ plz reply HERE (why?) ⇓ 03:15, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, vanity, nn. --Ter e nc e Ong 05:14, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not notable. DarthVad e r 05:56, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Userfy or delete. Obvious vanity (see author's username), but no other problems. JIP | Talk 10:02, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Userfy, unless more information comes to light. I'm surprised that no-one at least left the guy a comment linking to WP:AUTO though. - Motor (talk) 10:27, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete bad article on a non-notable person Deleteme42 11:42, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and expand credits include quite a few well-known places and television shows. Royalbroil 13:43, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Subject does not meet WP:BIO inclusion criteria. Since he has no userpage though, Userfy might be a nice gesture.--Isotope23 16:04, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Userfy Don't start your own entries. ~ trialsanderrors 21:43, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Userfy fails WP:PROF and the theater part is not notable. —M e ts501^talk 22:31, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Userfy & delete unless notability is verified. --Ezeu 23:50, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Just an typical middle class professional. Hawkestone 23:55, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Mets501. --Folajimi 23:14, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.