Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott Newton (Mississippi politician)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Singu larity 20:43, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Scott Newton (Mississippi politician)

Per WP:NN. Lost the only election he was in so he's hardly a "politician". Reads like a PR piece. -- ALLSTARecho 23:30, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Major party candidate for a major state office. Corvus cornix_talk 23:53, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete one-time defeated candidate and lawyer - will open a pandora's box. Shiva_eVolved 00:05, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - one-time defeated candidate for a state office. Ceased to be notable enough for an article the day after the election. KleenupKrew (talk) 00:15, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Was he notable enough the day before? Notability is not temporary. Rigadoun (talk) 06:03, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Are we reading the same Notability is not temporary? It reads: A short burst of present news coverage about a topic does not necessarily constitute objective evidence of long-term notability. Conversely, if long-term coverage has been sufficiently demonstrated, there is no need to show continual coverage or interest. He received a short burst of news coverage back in 2003, but nothing present so he loses that notability argument twice. And since no long-term coverage has been demonstrated, he loses that notability argument as well. He simply is NN. -- ALLSTARecho 07:23, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete. I found coverage of 2003 and 2007 races and a couple of local articles in 2006. He's not quite there with sustained or recurring coverage for WP:N. • Gene93k (talk) 09:40, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletions. —User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 16:39, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete as there is no assertion of notability. Losing candidates for political office and Reality shows are not notable per WP:BLP. Bearian'sBooties (talk) 18:26, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.