Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott Fisk

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 04:46, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Scott Fisk[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to fail WP:ACADEMIC. Text also appears to be copyvio of samford faculty profile. On his own website several national awards are listed however google only knows about them in relation to this individual. Claims for work appearing on major tv networks do not seem to be referenced anywhere. noq (talk) 21:30, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:51, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No notability of any sort apparent at present. Assistant Professors usually have not yet achieved notability. Xxanthippe (talk) 01:17, 24 March 2010 (UTC).[reply]
Delete. The whole thing is basically just a CV recitation. Only the last 2 sentences claim some minimal notability, but they provide no sources whatsoever. Probably could just have been prodded (I see speedy was justifiably declined). Respectfully, Agricola44 (talk) 14:55, 24 March 2010 (UTC).[reply]
Delete, assistant prof at tiny Stamford. Abductive (reasoning) 09:22, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.