Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scientology (disambiguation)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 01:18, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Scientology (disambiguation)[edit]

Unnecessary disambig page. Scientology prominently links to Church of Scientology, so there is no need for disambiguation. This page was created due to an incomprehensible page move war, it is now unnecessary and has no incoming links. Rhobite 06:11, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per above. Tempshill 06:21, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom -- Thesquire (talk - contribs) 06:46, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. -- JJay 07:21, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom --D a Gizza ^Chat 07:43, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Two item disambigs aren't a great use to anyone, especially when the two disambiguated topics are a religion and the church that practices it. -- Saberwyn - The Zoids Expansion Project 07:50, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep People do practice scientology without belonging to the offical church of scientology, I say keep its two separate articles, and possibly two separate ideas. If required ill reference. Mike 12:23, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- This is not a proposal to merge the two articles. All I'm saying is that this disambig page is useless because it isn't linked from anywhere and nobody is going to type "Scientology (disambiguation)" in the search box. Rhobite 15:48, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. The two disambiguated pages differ in subject and content only by extreme hair-splitting. wikipediatrix 13:50, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - A disambiguation isn't necessary here as Scientology and CoS refer to the same general thing. Cyde Weys _vote^talk 14:29, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The two topics are too closely related to justify disambiguation. Besides, anyone interested enough in the subject matter will know to type in one or the other if they want information on the organization specifically or the belief specifically. 23skidoo 15:37, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete — there's no ambiguity that needs correction. — RJH 16:45, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Just zis Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] AfD? 22:35, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Does not deserve a disambig page having only two entries. --Andylkl ^{[ talk! | c ]} 11:47, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.