Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SciPost Physics

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 09:06, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

SciPost Physics[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article de-PRODded by creator without justification given. PROD reason still stands: "Non-notable new journal. Not indexed in any selective databases (ESCI is not selective), no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG." Hence: delete. Randykitty (talk) 16:57, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academic journals-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 17:12, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Based on this, it might merit a mention at overlay journal. XOR'easter (talk) 19:46, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. XOR'easter (talk) 18:07, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment, there's ~~now a fork~~ also a draft of this at Draft:SciPost Physics. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 17:35, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: I had started Draft:SciPost Physics before this page came out. It is relatively new journal but is backed by several universities. --MaoGo (talk) 11:06, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment ... and that satisfies any notability requirements exactly how?? Any independent sources? Please note that !votes not based in policy (and yours basically is WP:ILIKEIT) are wont to be ignored by the closing admin. --Randykitty (talk) 11:19, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm trying to compile whatever I can find that is reliable. --MaoGo (talk) 12:57, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no refs for any of the content other than an index entry, questionable notability. Agricolae (talk) 14:09, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.