Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Schwärmer
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:06, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Schwärmer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Pure dictionary definition of German word. However, the wikipedia is not a dictionary; and the English wikipedia especially isn't a dictionary of foreign words. I have already transwikied it to wiktionary, and I'm calling for DELETE. - Wolfkeeper 21:51, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Wikipedia is not a dictionary. At most this should be a redirect to the religious group it sometimes referred to. Edison (talk) 02:39, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. WP:NOTDIC. Not independently notable. — Rankiri (talk) 16:31, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect - Not notable and fails WP:DICDEF, though a retarget to Anabaptist, the group the term refers to, would probably make sense, Lord Spongefrog, (I am Czar of all Russias!) 17:29, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.