Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/School prank (4th nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep, bad faith nom. ~ c. tales \\tk// 04:30, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

School prank

Original research and things made up in school one day. Hardee67 00:42, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. TJ Spyke 00:46, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment this was a bad faith nom by a blocked user; however, given that there has since been a delete vote; I didn't want to close it prematurely. Peyna 02:38, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep, apparent non-good-faith nomination, based on admin's deletion of the AfD template. —C.Fred (talk) 02:46, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Gazpacho 03:09, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep this is not what "things made up in school one day" is designed to exclude. Silensor 07:05, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above Konman72 10:52, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, seems to be entirely original research. --Bakanov (talk • contribs) 11:53, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep- perfectly acceptable article Martinp23
Delete This article isnt worthy for an encylcopedia, we all know what a school prank is, also this article seems to be slightly for pranking, including the various methods seems a lot like instructions to me. (Neostinker 14:00, 12 August 2006 (UTC))[reply]
Delete per above. NCurse _work 14:38, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above. Not OR for the most part. I have been out of school for 25 years but have either been on the giving or receiving end of nearly all of the pranks. Ohconfucius 15:31, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep there are lots of citations in the article and easily meets notability requirements hoopydink^{Conas tá tú?} 18:24, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Week delete. Doesn't look very encyclopaedic to me. Too much original research for my liking. Almost implies that there are "official" school pranks. -- Necrothesp 22:16, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep as the nominator has made no valid arguments (school pranks are well known and easily verifiable). — Reinyday, 22:18, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
Strong keep. Just because the article has something to do with school doesn't mean that the nominator can pull out WP:NFT. I agree with Reinyday. --דניאל ~ Danielrocks123 ^{talk contribs Email} 23:36, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, not a speedy candidate. --badlydrawnjeff talk 12:45, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Needs a little rewriting. (Is it me or the triggerhappy deleters are really proliferated lately?) Frigo 22:49, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep Once again Wikipedia snobs show their true colors as Social Control specialists, this information is a knowledge base and can be as rightly pointed out on another page drawn from for articles relating to bullying and playground culture. --Kenscanna 16:57 15th Aug 2006
Delete. WP is not a how-to guide ... forward it to Wikibooks. Lincher 21:12, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It's unwelcome info for some, but information none the less. ThuranX 02:44, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. It doesn't look like OR to me, school pranks are a well known phenomenon. Themindset 22:29, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Reasonably interesting article.Park3r 21:50, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment

It should be sent to Wikibooks as it is a how to guide to pranks in school. Lincher 21:12, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.