Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SchoolTool SMS

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. signed, Rosguill talk 14:13, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

SchoolTool SMS[edit]

SchoolTool SMS (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable software fails WP:GNG, no coverage outside of local news. Covered only once in a Rochester local interest paper, and in a Rochester business journal. ~ A412 talk! 03:58, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:39, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 07:45, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Per nom. Sourcing simply isn't there to show this meets WP:NSOFTWARE or WP:GNG. Only local coverage, and even that seems to be regurgitated press releases. - MrOllie (talk) 20:50, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 12:05, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Democrat & Chronicle: Mindex's schooltool software turns 15 IgelRM (talk) 13:26, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: fails NSOFT. And with all due respect to Democrat and Chronicle, a puff piece in a Rochester local newspaper isn't enough to establish notability. Owen× 23:02, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: This subject fails to meet the notability criteria for inclusion on Wikipedia; there appears to be a lack of significant coverage PhantomSteve/talk¦contribs\ 08:47, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Per nom. SpacedFarmer (talk) 11:20, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.