Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Schapiro Hall
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 16:33, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Schapiro Hall (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article about a non-notable building. Prod was declined four years ago. TM 22:09, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete not notable. SYSS Mouse (talk) 22:36, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. —• Gene93k (talk) 01:20, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:20, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- weak Keep because of the NYT article--the dorm seems to have had a particular significance outside the local student community. DGG ( talk ) 05:54, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Notability established. I think that if Namiba want to establish a guideline or policy change regardng the coverage of dormitory buildings, we should have a well-publicized RFC at Wikiproject Universities rather that going through these AfDs. Racepacket (talk) 11:42, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - I agree with DGG. At least there was some mention in a major newspaper. PDCook (talk) 13:27, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Again, this is one of many, many college residence articles that User:Namiba has nominated, PRODed, or redirected. (There are more on the March 23 page.) I would hope that we could develop a generic policy at Wikiproject Universities instead of proceeding in this fashion. Racepacket (talk) 11:53, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.