Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scary Movie 6
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 06:13, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Scary Movie 6 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Scary Movie 5 is not even out yet and already a page on Scary Movie 6? Wikipedia is not a crystal ball, unsourced and very little content. Atlan (talk) 18:33, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. No verifiable information available for the next couple of years, thus no chance of article having any relevant content. Create again when information released. --Darkbane 18:50, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete way too early at this stage of production to have an article. Blueboy96 19:51, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as violating WP:V, and protected redirect to Scary Movie to prevent further crystal balling. --Kinu t/c 21:10, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Do Not Delete. Why would you delete this article? There are pages for films that will be released way after 2009 to 2010.- GTAGeek123 talk 20:21, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]- Comment: GTAGeek123 is the author of the article in question. Here is an example of a movie expected in 2010. Notice how much more verifiable information it contains. It's also notable for featuring Antonio Banderas. Many other future movies are the same. Here is a movie expected in 2009. It has thirteen references and three pages of text. That's quite a bit more than what this article has. Right now there isn't a single reference in it, it does not have an IMDB entry, and Google only turns up a fan trailer. Once there is enough valid information available to substantiate an article though, it should be created. --Darkbane 22:14, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Heh, didn't we just do this with Scary Movie 5 like a month ago? Will the Propellerheads be featured on the soundtrack? ;) Seriously though, the reason that article eventually made it through DRV was that there were new sources (and there's a reason why the editing history wasn't recreated). This article doesn't have any sources. Seed 2.0 22:19, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as complete crystalballism. There's no proof that the movie will even be made. DarkAudit 22:29, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Per WP:Crystal ball. No verifiable information available since even the fifth one hasn't been released yet. --Nehrams2020 04:15, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete not enough material known and it is still a good 3 years away. --JForget 19:46, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, pure speculation. Punkmorten 20:25, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, fine, I guess since Scary Movie 5 isnt even out yet, that the page should maybe be recreated when more information about the film comes out. - GTAGeek123 talk 20:21, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment, I think that this discussion is over and that the page is ready to be deleted. GTAGeek123 talk 20:21, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Then why did you add a link to Scary Movie 6 on the Scary Movie 5 page moments later? Doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me.--Atlan (talk) 11:19, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom, more of the same crystal balling. RFerreira 06:01, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment, the reason I put a link to Scary Movie 6 on the Scary Movie 5 page is because I thought visitors of the scary movie 5 page might wanna know about the little details surrounding Scary Movie 6. I think it makes perfect sense. -GTAGeek123 23:50, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Well, if you want the page deleted, the last thing you want to do is have other pages link to it. It just means someone has to remove those links again later on.--Atlan (talk) 23:54, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- And ill be the one to delete them, and besides its just one page...-GTAGeek123 22:01, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.