Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scarface CLimax
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete --JForget 01:04, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Scarface CLimax (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Contested PROD. Plot summary and analysis of a portion of a movie. WP:NOT certainly applies here. Acroterion (talk) 15:51, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong DElete, original research and plot summary of a movie; the verifiable information already exists in the main Scarface article. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 15:52, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I see what you did there with the capitalization. I lol'd. Celarnor Talk to me 15:56, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. A much better place for this information would be the Scarface article, but that already seems to contain most of the usable information from this article. Celarnor Talk to me 15:56, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Per nom. Luksuh
- Delete per nom. Total plot summary. I guess someone really likes this movie... — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 16:16, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete a plot summary, and also a essay. Everything that can be said about this is already said better in the actual Scarface article Doc StrangeMailboxLogbook 16:53, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Article is complete original research and is an essay with no WP:V or WP:N. --Pmedema (talk) 17:46, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete It's an essay, no encyclopedic value. JeremyMcCracken (talk) (contribs) 19:09, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. ukexpat (talk) 19:16, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Article is bad writen (CL in title? wrong), lacks resources (total original research). Zero Kitsune (talk) 00:01, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.