Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scandinavian Airlines System Flight 901

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Yunshui ^雲 _水 11:53, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Scandinavian Airlines System Flight 901[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable aviation incident. Runway overruns are common. No need for an independent article. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 21:20, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 21:21, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 21:21, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 21:21, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 21:21, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Not only does this easily pass WP:GNG, also passes essay WP:AIRCRASH - "The accident or incident resulted in changes to procedures, regulations or processes affecting airports, airlines or the aircraft industry." Major jetliners such as DC-10s as this one was overrunning runways are not common and they should not happen, thus these uncommon incidents are notable to both the aviation industry and the public. --Oakshade (talk) 04:44, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:GNG and WP:AIRCRASH. This was a serious incident resulting in over 100 injuries and substantial damage to a widebody jet. A full NTSB Aircraft Accident Report was produced (there are usually less than 20 per year, sometimes less than 10, always focused on the most serious aviation incidents). The NTSB recommendations drove the FAA to mandate pilot training and safety changes. Not sure how this is not notable. Shelbystripes (talk) 06:21, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep According to WP:AIRCRASH.Bingobro (Chat) 14:56, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as per above - Meets WP:AIRCRASH as well as WP:GNG. –Davey2010 ^{Merry Xmas / Happy New Year} 16:51, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above. Close per SNOW. South Nashua (talk) 04:24, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.