Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scale of trust
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Using the picture as "evidence" is a circular argument. You created both; one cannot be used as evidence of the other. howcheng {chat} 22:39, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Even without the image, this term does not exist.-- Perfecto 07:22, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete this neologism --Perfecto 07:22, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Article has no research value. (aeropagitica) 07:26, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete -- Astrokey44|talk 10:21, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Wikipedia is not for things made up in school one day. —Quarl (talk) 2006-01-18 11:25Z
- Delete per nom. Mark K. Bilbo 19:28, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- "Wikipedia does not accept articles on fan-made neologisms unless they have realistic evidence of existence via verifiable usage data." <-- the picture is realistic evidence. Kenneth 21:48, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.