Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sblnet

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Moved to user page and deleted per author request --O bli (Talk)^? 18:14, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sblnet[edit]

Reads as an advertisement, written by a user with the same name as the article (vanity), one and a half million-ish Alexa rank, Google doesn't even recognize sblnet as a real word (suggests another spelling). --O bli (Talk)^? 17:05, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Was about to nominate it for AfD. Strong Delete. James Kendall [talk] 17:16, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. NN internet community. Advertising & vanity. Slowmover 17:23, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reply from Article's Author: The article has been edited so it's quite clear that it's no longer any more of an advertisement than any other organisation's page (ie: contains 1-2 links at the base). Google suggests different spelling, because "sblnet" is not a real English word - any idiot would actually realise thats not a real word by itself; but google, wikipedia or msn are not "real words" either; so I'd say, based on that - there's no longer any reason for deletion; oh, unless my apparent vanity counts. (user: Sblnet)

The alexa rank is low. So it's a NN site, and therefore not worthy of a Wiki entry. Why not put it as part of your userpage instead? James Kendall [talk] 17:47, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Read WP:WEB and WP:VANITY. There is nothing asserted about "sblnet" that makes it notable. There are no supporting citations from unrelated published sources. The "real word" comment can be ignored; it's not a reason to delete. There is no encyclopedic content here. Also read WP:NOT. Slowmover 17:49, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Try searching for 'slashdot', it's not an English word, either. --O bli (Talk)^? 17:52, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reply from Article's Author: Alright thanks, a decent reason was all I wanted =) Can't a just delete the thing myself?
EDIT: Obli - You need a hobby, something that might stop you from being such a patronising fool (user: Sblnet)

OK, the real word argument was kind of weak, but the slashdot comment was just to prove that Google would have accepted the spelling if the site was more published. --O bli (Talk)^? 18:14, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete/move to user space -- getcrunk juice ^contribs 18:05, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.