Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saya Otonashi (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect. Secret ^account 21:34, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Saya Otonashi[edit]

Fails WP:FICT and WP:PLOT. Saya is radically different in the two, a separate article is not only unnotable, but also unnecessary. The individual articles for Blood the Last Vampire and List of Blood+ characters already cover her sufficiently. Note, first AfD closed with recommendation to merge, which was done, but someone undid it later. Collectonian 09:06, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletions. —Quasirandom 21:22, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletions. —Quasirandom 21:23, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletions. -- Hiding T 17:04, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as nominated by Collectonian. The article is comprised of regurgitated plot summary, whilst the lack of primary and secondary sources throws doubt on the notability of these fictional characters outside of the Blood+ franchise. --Gavin Collins 13:04, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per previous AfD and the guidelines in WP:FICT to List of Blood+ characters. Does not meet the guidelines of WP:FICT for a separate article. —Quasirandom 16:42, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and recent afd. We already have enough information here. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 23:33, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Delete as per all of the above. This article is already covered at List of Blood+ characters#Saya Otonashi and I agree with WP:WAF and WP:NOT#IINFO. Greg Jones II 00:16, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per previous AfD. The content has already been merged, and this title can be kept as a suitable redirect. —TangentCube, Dialogues 02:07, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, But try to expand in some way possible... RedEyesMetal (talk) 18:02, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re-merge. -- Ned Scott 04:21, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.