Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Save Our State, The Real Story

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. -Splash^talk 23:10, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Save Our State, The Real Story[edit]

Save Our State is trying to get around the NPOV editing that is going on in the real Save Our State Entry- they want a wikipedia that they alone edit that is "the truth"- aka from their perspective only. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Elzia (talk • contribs)

Delete. Forked off of Save Our State. Evil saltine 04:03, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as duplicate. Sycthos ^Talk 04:11, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as POV fork. —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-01-20 04:19Z
Delete as POV fork as per nomination. — CJewell (talk to me) 04:44, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete POV fork. Save Our State is protected while editors come to consensus. Other editors are invited to pitch in. Cheers, Will Beback 05:00, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom --NaconKantari (話)|(郵便) 05:18, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete POV fork in clear violation of policy. FCYTravis 08:38, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Eesh... Grandmasterka 09:23, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as a POV fork. JIP | Talk 09:39, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
delete completely forked. BL kiss the lizard 09:48, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Move to Save Our State, a semi-literate racist's perspective -- GWO
Delete: POV Dynayellow 12:32, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Any time the word "Real" shows up in a title I'm likely to be suspicious. --StuffOfInterest 14:01, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
DO NOT Delete. This entry is a reaction to the vandalizing of the first SOS article that was initially posted by the same author. To most prudent people, this article was informative and worth being here. What ever happend to wiki articles being informative and neutral? I found it both. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.148.142.231 (talk • contribs)
Delete as unnecessary fork. The POV issues in the original article should be resolved instead.KrazyCaley 23:37, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Evilsaltine. BTW, the user who voted against deletion claims that "the first SOS article that was initially posted by the same author", which is untrue. Check the history and you'll find that the first version was a POV stub, and the rest of the language (with minor exceptions) is MINE. Not that I'm possessive or anything 8).--Rockero420 00:10, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete; POV fork; always delete POV forks. Antandrus (talk) 00:12, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, POV fork. Calling themselves a civil rights organization is absurd, as well. User:Zoe|^(talk) 04:43, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as blatant violation of WP:FORK. Cyde Weys 05:21, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.