Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saurav Chaudhary

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 12:35, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Saurav Chaudhary

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. Refbombed with non-RS. Usedtobecool ^TALK ✨ 06:32, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Usedtobecool ^TALK ✨ 06:32, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Usedtobecool ^TALK ✨ 06:32, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions. Usedtobecool ^TALK ✨ 06:32, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - I've fixed the references and did some changes accordingly. IMO, remarkable person. Kind regards, — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 11:22, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Tulsi Bhagat, I fear you may have misunderstood the very purpose of an AFD. While refbombing was/is a problem, that's not why it's here (it's only an explanation that appearances are deceiving in this case). I am claiming that the subject is not notable enough for inclusion in the English Wikipedia. A policy-based "keep" !vote is required to demonstrate that I am mistaken. Regards! Usedtobecool ^TALK ✨ 12:01, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Usedtobecool: Thank you for your concern. I believe the subject is notable enough. I've fixed the references. Let me do a policy-based "keep" !vote for you, It either meets WP:SIGCOV and/or WP:DIRECTOR. That's why I've added a clear cut "Keep", but you didn't get it well. I hope I am more clear than before. Thank you for your understanding! Kind regards, — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 03:18, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
My apologies. That makes your "Keep" an assertion, not an argument. Regards! Usedtobecool ^TALK ✨ 19:34, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

And, you've far from fixed the sources. filmykhabar.com is openly for promot[ing] Nepali film, filmmakers, actors & financiers and boasts one chief-editor, one technical editor and one editor, lumbinimedia.com is (wut?), likenepal.com is business not journalism, moviemandu.com has a team of four (ok for filling in the blanks, doesn't count towards notability), hariyopati.com boasts one editor, saurahaonline.com boasts an editorial team of 2 (or is that three?), glamournepal.com has one editor and one reporter, and to top it all of cinelahar.com is a personal blog. Regards! Usedtobecool ^TALK ✨ 19:53, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete — Has directed one notable film which is also running at AFD. There is nothing else to show he is notable. There are About 1,380,000 results on Google but there is nothing about him. CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 19:18, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.