Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saurashtra Premier League

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:23, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Saurashtra Premier League[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable local cricket tournament. Not enough coverage to meet WP:GNG Joseph2302 (talk) 09:21, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Cricket, and India. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:21, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There seems to be quite a lot of news coverage - particularly of the legal bits and pieces - Indian Express, Time of India etc... Am I missing something here? Blue Square Thing (talk) 10:42, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. More so because it fails WP:NCRIC. StickyWicket (talk) 13:03, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
NCRIC doesn't supercede GNG and applies only to biographies, so is totally irrelevant here. _wjemather^{please leave a message...} 16:05, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Seems to be a substantial amount of coverage, especially in Gujarati, from which the article could be expanded. _wjemather^{please leave a message...} 16:05, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Personally think there's enough here for a GNG pass on the tournament. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 18:17, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 11:32, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 12:00, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.