Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Satyajit Padhye
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep. EdJohnston (talk) 22:13, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Satyajit Padhye (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
notability. The article seems to be created by the subject of the article. Dwaipayan (talk) 15:16, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - notability not established. Frank | talk 16:47, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Neutral - the article is improved; I question the notability somewhat but I no longer feel deletion is a clear choice. Frank | talk 12:50, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. I've added some references to the article to establish notability. Phil Bridger (talk) 10:52, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, jonny-mt 03:50, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. —brewcrewer (yada, yada) 04:43, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. —brewcrewer (yada, yada) 04:45, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep with some cleanup - While the article reads like a magazine article (see COI concerns mentioned in nomination), the references seem to establish notability. Blaxthos ( t / c ) 04:48, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Notability not established by ref to numerous multiple reliable sources. MilkFloat 10:10, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. There are three such sources in the article. How many more do you want? Phil Bridger (talk) 12:30, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Self-promotional peiece, non-notable topic--Deepak D'Souza (talk • contribs) 11:44, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- weak keep - I am assuming that getting mentioned 3 times on newspapers is enough to establish notability.⇨ EconomistBR ⇦ Talk 07:04, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.