Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Satya Prabhakar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Sulekha. (non-admin closure) st170e^talk 01:21, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Satya Prabhakar[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Searches found several links, which is expected, at News, browsers and WP:INDAFD, but none of it is actually convincing of his own notable article thus I suggest this is could, if needed, redirected to the company after it's deleted; however I also note that's only if needed at best since that may put this vulnerable to restarting. I should also note it may also not be best to leave this open to restarting because this has basically stayed the same and virtually unchanged with no improvements since starting in September 2009 so there's nothing convincing to suggest why we should keep traces of the article with a redirect link. SwisterTwister talk 07:12, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:15, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. He's the founder of the company so a redirect at least seems appropriate. Why would it need to be deleted before it could be redirected to the company? Why couldn't this have been merged/redirected rather than bringing it to AfD? --Michig (talk) 07:27, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:13, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:14, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and redirect: You don't need to delete this article, just merge it with the company and redirect. Delete the redirect, and yes, someone will just restart the article. Redirects are good to have for that reason. Montanabw ^(talk) 20:11, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect, per Wikipedia's standard practise. Unnecessary AfD. Cavarrone 20:36, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.