Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Satisfaction with Life Index (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus with no prejudice against speedy renomination. (non-admin closure) Bungle (talk • contribs) 22:10, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
Satisfaction with Life Index[edit]
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Satisfaction with Life Index (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not a notable statistical index. Appears to have been a one-off meta-analysis journal article by a non-notable researcher. Doesn't seem to be tied to more current "happiness by country" studies such as World Happiness Report. The BBC source [1] is an excellent example of bad science journalism; it is also contemporaneous and largely an interview with him. User:力百 (alt of power~enwiki, π, ν) 20:08, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. User:力百 (alt of power~enwiki, π, ν) 20:08, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
- Comment: There is some indication that it may meet criteria for WP:GNG but more reliable, independent sources are needed. Multi7001 (talk) 04:33, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 20:46, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 21:07, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.