Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Satanic baptism
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete --JForget 23:52, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Satanic baptism[edit]
- Satanic baptism (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Unreferenced, unverified article, violates WP:NPOV Closedmouth (talk) 09:31, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails WP:N and WP:RS. Masterpiece2000 (talk) 09:54, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The external links in the article are all to locations that offer personal web hosting, and their content does not seem to verify the article. This search turns up more websites on personal hosting services, tangential mentions of the term that don't seem to involve the practice in question, blogs and some first party sources by supposedly satanic organizations — schismatic groups derived from the Church of Satan and its practices. The lack of neutrality is well exemplified by the scare quotes around "original sin." deranged bulbasaur 10:26, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:RS. Unschool (talk) 16:09, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as original research if it can't be sourced, otherwise merge to satanism. JIP | Talk 18:03, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. On a quick glance at various possible sources, I don't see the solid references that are needed for a good article, and it's pretty clearly non-notable as well. —Switchercat talkcont 19:45, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above Mardetanha talk 20:22, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 21:37, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - article as it stands violated several policies and guidelines. Article could be recreated if reliable, verifiable sources regarding the subject could be found and added. John Carter (talk) 21:45, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.