Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Satan LaVey

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. W.marsh 01:50, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Satan LaVey

Non notable biography. Just being the sun of a notable person doesn't make you notable yourself. Pegasus1138^{Talk | Contribs | Email} ---- 22:18, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, no evidence of notability; I agree with Pegasus that being his father's son isn't enough. --Allen 22:48, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Like Stalin's granddaughter, I think this bears writing about. — Adrian~enwiki (talk) 23:07, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete NN. What is there of value to say about a 12-year-old child? That he likes to skateboard? That his best subject in school is math? Fan1967 23:23, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable. Poledancer 23:47, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Suggest not notable enough. Iloveparis 23:49, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge I think this is a good case for a merger into the relevant article. ---J.Smith 23:53, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment It's already there. There's a line that says LaVey's wife had a son with that name on that date. Fan1967 00:03, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This article does not contain any information that is not already contained in the article for his father, Anton LaVey. Does not assert notability in his own right. Accurizer 23:59, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
keep no reason to delete. Niffweed17, Destroyer of Chickens 00:40, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Should be make bios for the brothers, sisters, parents, children, grandparents, and grandchildren of every person we have a bio on? No. kotepho 02:52, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The information should be in Anton's article, not two. Perhaps make it a redirect to Anton's page. King-of-no-pants 02:54, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable. Absolutely no reason to keep. Perspective 03:04, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Slight merge and redirect to Anton LaVey. WP:BIO is quite clear that non-notable relatives of notable people are mentioned in the notable person's article, and don't get their own. This is not a keep vote. Stifle 00:11, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge as per above. Chairman S. ^Talk 21:39, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not notable. Add info to Anton's page. JackO'Lantern 06:01, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment we have numerous pages on otherwise nn people who happen to be the great (x4/5/6) grandchild of Queen Victoria; their only (minor) claim to notability being that geneology. Does the same standard apply? Carlossuarez46 20:10, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- No, because the Europeans were clever enough to formalize their caste system with titles, and by convention Viscounts and the other inbred riff-raff of the old word are 'notable' because of their titles (not, strictly speaking, their ancestry alone). Nice deal for them, but at least we won't have to put up with Marquess Gates, 11th Viscount of Microsoft. Herostratus
Delete unless he grows up to be the Antichrist or something. When he begins to channel demons and move between dimensions or kill people by looking at them or whatnot, then he can get an article. Herostratus 15:45, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.