Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saskia Hampele

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 04:19, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Saskia Hampele[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. Notability not demonstrated, no significant roles or references, fails WP:CREATIVE. WWGB (talk) 01:51, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —WWGB (talk) 02:02, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. —WWGB (talk) 02:02, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep have been able to find numerous verifiable sources clearly identifying significant roles in several recent feature films. I have included these in recent edits to the article. Dan arndt (talk) 08:58, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per added material Satu Suro 10:33, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:52, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NACTOR. Has not had significant roles in multiple notable films etc.; no evidence of a large fan base; no evidence of unique contributions. She appears to be a character actor of no particular note so far in her career, mostly appearing in short films and guest spots on TV shows. If this is not the case, someone needs to make the notability more obvious. // ⌘macwhiz (talk) 23:49, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment she has appeared in two notable films to date, as well as a recurring role on a TV sitcom series. Dan arndt (talk) 23:59, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Having "appeared" is not sufficient, the subject must have had significant roles. I see no evidence of that. WWGB (talk) 00:24, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:ENT. Almost all her roles are very minor which can be demonstrated by IMDB being the only one to cover her roles. Lacks indepth coverage about her as a person. LibStar (talk) 06:50, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment IMDb is not the only source covering her various roles in films, short films and television. Dan arndt (talk) 23:59, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

regardless there is a complete lack of indepth coverage of this person and their roles. LibStar (talk) 00:01, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. Parts played are not significant roles in multiple notable productions. reviews for the films [1] [2] [3] indicates minor parts. duffbeerforme (talk) 06:27, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment text added "Blame was screened and received accolades at Cannes Film Festival, Melbourne International Film Festival, the 35th Toronto International Film Festival[8], the 47th Chicago International Film Festival[9] and Buenos Aires International Film Festival of Independent Cinema." is about the film not the actor but padding added to make this actress look more notable. LibStar (talk) 14:42, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.