Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sardar Bahadur Muhammad Ismail

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ˉˉ^anetode╦╩ 06:57, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sardar Bahadur Muhammad Ismail

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I cannot find sufficient RS sources supporting notability of this person, under wp standards. The article has been tagged for notability since 2010. It has only one source, which does not appear to me to be an RS. Others are welcome to try to find better indicia of notability. Epeefleche (talk) 15:47, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Earlier versions of the article indicate that he subsequently became a district magistrate, which may be notability (districts are the next level down from 'state' in India). Also note that "Sardar Bahadur" is a title, not part of his name, which may hinder searching. DS (talk) 16:58, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Was there RS sourcing for that claim?--Epeefleche (talk) 16:59, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 20:15, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 20:15, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no evidence of sources to meet WP:BIO. LibStar (talk) 12:25, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and Redirect to Order of British India#First Class where the small amount of content can be added to his entry. Bridgeplayer (talk) 17:29, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.