Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarath Rajapatirana

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 17:57, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sarath Rajapatirana

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article appears to have been compiled from a series of brief mentions in the various references provided. It does not appear to satisfy WP:NACADEMICS or WP:BIO based on the information provided. I don't believe that being given a Fullbright Scholar grant is a 'highly prestigious academic award' (criteria #2) or that the books he has written are 'academic work that has made a significant impact in the area of higher education, affecting a substantial number of academic institutions' (criteria #4). Essentially this is a non-notable individual that an editor has tried to pass off as notable. Dan arndt (talk) 06:58, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 07:02, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sri Lanka-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 07:02, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:18, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington, D.C.-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:18, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:19, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 03:40, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom fails WP:NACADEMICS and WP:GNG.117.223.180.70 (talk) 12:07, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I agree with the nominator that the accomplishments presented in the article, including the Fullbright and the mid-level managerial position at the World Bank, are not enough for notability. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:10, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.