Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarah Vandella

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:41, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sarah Vandella

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails PORNBIO and the GNG. No awards, just nominations. Negligible, mostly trivial biographical content. Negligible independent sourcing. Original PROD disruptively removed without explanation or article improvement by the usual suspect. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by administrators since 2006. (talk) 18:56, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:01, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:02, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:02, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Sure, why not, this is an article that actually does fail WP:PORNBIO. There are still many articles on here that fail PORNBIO. Now stop taking winners of non-scene/ensemble awards to AfD/PROD. It's as disruptive as Redban was. Rebecca1990 (talk) 22:51, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 23:01, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Rebecca1990. Spartaz ^Humbug! 23:12, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as there is a lack of reliable sources coverage that is independent, a lack of mainstream coverage, no awards claimed, no blockbusters or new genres so WP:PORNBIO and WP:BASIC are not passed. Atlantic306 (talk) 01:37, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as fails PORNBIO ... but meets HOTTIE –Davey2010^Talk 03:00, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per my original prod rationale. Cavarrone 18:50, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as this is still questionable for the applicable pornography notability. SwisterTwister talk 05:52, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails both PORNBIO and GNG. Wikiuser20102011 (talk) 19:22, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.