Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarah Thomson (actress) (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:56, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sarah Thomson (actress)

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The actress possibly lacks notability to have her own article. The article itself has ~~zero~~ only 3 (edited after nomination as noticed it has 3 references, albeit none possibly pass the notability guidance) references and not much can be found about her on the web. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 10:20, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Radio, and New Zealand. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 10:20, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:25, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete She's most known for her roles in the Power Rangers, yet the text doesn't discuss them and the characters are secondary (from what I see). I'm not showing ACTOR as being met. Oaktree b (talk) 12:11, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This lazy !vote is a strawman. Makes a claim that is not true so they can knock it down. Totally dismisses her biggest roles. duffbeerforme (talk) 10:43, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. ~~Comment~~. If anything gets her over the threshold for WP:NACTOR, it'd be her roles in Shortland Street and The Moe Show; the former is a recurring role in a very significant show, the latter is a lead role in a less significant show. I've added some additional sources but still not convinced she meets WP:SIGCOV. Staying on the fence for now, but will keep thinking on it. Chocmilk03 (talk) 00:38, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've done a bit more digging (see my amends to the article) and am updating my vote to keep. Significant roles in multiple notable productions, so presumption is in favour of notability, and there is a reasonable amount of coverage in reliable sources about her roles in Shortland Street and The Moe Show. Chocmilk03 (talk) 22:53, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Passes NACTOR with her roles in Shortland Street and The Moe Show. duffbeerforme (talk) 10:43, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:14, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep clearly meets NACTOR criteria 1 WilsonP NYC (talk) 00:48, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Additional discussion of the available source material, and its sufficiency (or lack thereof) for an article, would be very helpful.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 05:45, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - subjects meets WP:NACTOR and the references in the article support this. - Indefensible (talk) 04:44, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.