Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarah Shantz-Smiley

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) feminist | freedom isn't free 02:54, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sarah Shantz-Smiley[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:NHOCKEY and fails WP:GNG Joeykai (talk) 20:14, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Joeykai (talk) 20:14, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:03, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Passes WP:GNG with the sources already in the article. -- Dammit_steve (talk) 21:18, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:28, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:28, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. The sources in the article are just routine sports reporting. Deadman137 (talk) 14:15, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Thats a suprising take because these sources [1][2][3][4] are all in the article and are not routine sports reporting. Here is also a feature about her turning around the national team program. Dammit_steve (talk) 17:07, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, subject passes WP:GNG as shown above. Sources in other languages are sufficient to demonstrate notability. Flibirigit (talk) 12:47, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - some great sources in the article. Nfitz (talk) 02:23, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.