Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarah Larson (2nd nomination)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. John254 02:26, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Sarah Larson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable person. Read article Talk Page. Proxy User (talk) 12:44, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep She has received plenty of significant coverage in reliable sources establishing notability per WP:BIO. This coverage is still continuing now - such as this and this which shows she has been signed up as a model by the fashion designer Christian Audigier. She is thus notable for the coverage in reliable sources and for more than one thing so not a WP:BLP1E. Davewild (talk) 13:08, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong keep. Still getting considerable press for events after her breakup from Clooney. Looks like she'll be around for a while. Easily notable. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 14:21, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Notability doesn't expire. Once someone is notable, they stay that way. Doc StrangeMailboxLogbook 15:09, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- brewcrewer (yada, yada) 16:12, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep but just because of the peoples magazine article. (rant on) Just because our wonderful press decides that the love life of our celebrates is somehow important I strongly disagree that it makes someone notable. (/rant off) GtstrickyTalk or C 16:52, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete. Bwrs (talk) 19:42, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong keep once notable, always notable ukexpat (talk) 20:15, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Davewild's remarks. Cleo123 (talk) 04:06, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.